Showing posts with label joshua sofaer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label joshua sofaer. Show all posts
Saturday, 23 June 2012
Writing Machine: Live Art UK Gathering
by Mary Paterson
Live Art is not interested in the
articulation of real talent; live art is interested in the articulation of real
desire. If you can tolerate this,
then see what’s coming next. Art is the name for all
the things we do that try to change the world. A lot of direct
action is bad performance. Online space is
corporately owned, private space. Good things happen on the periphery.
Is it important that I like the work that I produce?
How things are valued is very much to do with where
they are – that’s not right, but it is a fact. We are interested in artists; but what we’re really
interested in is ideas. I promise
you, I never deliberately programmed any live art.
None of this is new, but what it is, these days, is really fashionable. There
is no work that is not participative – so what are we talking about when we say
“participation” and “engagement”?
A collection of statements from the
Live Art UK Gathering, BAC June 2012.
Stacy Mackishi. Matt Ball. Andy Field. Kevin Smith. Boo Chapelle. Louise
Jeffreys. Joshua Sofaer. Lyn Gardner. Helen
Marriage. Louise Jeffreys. Helen
Marriage. Joshua Sofaer.
Thursday, 15 April 2010
Launch of In Time, and thoughts on the definitions of art

written by Mary Paterson
The London launch of In Time (a series of commissioned essays on live art and it’s effects, published by Live Art UK) was held last Tuesday, 13th April. The book is an advocacy tool and study resource for funders, programmers and artists within and without the sector. As such, it’s faced with the problematic task of actually describing that thing we are all engaged with – what is it? This stuff we keep doing, which seems so popular, so urgent, and yet so fragile?
I’ve always thought of art as a type of politics. My current working definition of art is a cultural space that stands beside utility. Sometimes I think of the space of art as a series of alcoves along a corridor. It is not the journey from A to B, nor a birds-eye view, but it is a position. Meanwhile, the definition of live art that I have been carrying round for some time is that live art is strategically interdisciplinary. (This definition is lifted, and quite possibly twisted, from a sentence that has since been replaced on the ‘What is Live Art’ page of the Live Art Development Agency’s website.)
It’s easy to see that live art is a politics, because it’s not tied to any form. Like painting, for example, but without the baggage. That’s not the same as saying that live art is always my politics, although I’d certainly like to identify with the culture of generosity that Sonya Dyer, speaking on Tuesday night, said pervades the sector as a whole.
And while politics may be expressed through an open relation with form, the equation does not work in the opposite direction. Formlessness might be a tool, but it can never be the material manifestation of a political stance. Think of Richard Wright's work which won the Turner Prize last year. Temporal, temporary and responsive to its environment, Wright’s mural for the exhibition was tinged by its context in a way that was little acknowledged at the time. I lost count of the number of people who asked me if I had seen the Turner Prize work, ‘which is going to disappear.’ The hype did not focus on the time of the mural, but on the fact that the time for viewing it was nearly up. In the context of this prestigious prize, it seems, witnessing a temporary act can slide dangerously close to receiving an exclusive privilege.
Despite its slipperiness, I have recently heard a few definitions of art, and particularly live art, that are appealing. At the In Time launch Andy Field from Forest Fringe said that live art is defined, ‘not by what it is, but by what it could be.’ And at the lecture he gave to mark the launch of his book, ‘The Many Headed Monster’ last week, Joshua Sofaer suggested that a determining principle of art, as opposed to craft, could be that its effects are not only felt at the time; they also grown on reflection. I like both of these definitions, and I am going to use them to build one of my own:
(live) art is an attitude, and it grows
The artist Rajni Shah put it even better when she compared live art to a vehicle (which she proposed as one, partial, metaphor). ‘It keeps moving.’ She said, ‘And it can change direction.’
Seeing as we’re on a theme of formlessness, I would also like to suggest another (partial, certainly temporal and quite possibly temporary) word to describe art. The word is ‘yet.’ Yet, is it art? Is it art, yet? Yet is a word that anticipates the future and builds on the past. (I explored this theme for my piece for the Oxhouse Alphabet). Is it a coincidence that one of the synonyms my computer finds for ‘yet’ is ‘in time’?
In Time features essays on Infrastructure, Public Engagement, and Legacies, commissioned by members of Live Art UK. (My essay on critical writing was commissioned by the Live Art Development Agency.) It is available to buy here, or to download as a pdf for free here. For more information on In Time, go here.
Wednesday, 7 April 2010
Audience horror stories and ‘The Many Headed Monster’ by Joshua Sofaer

written by Mary Paterson
We all have a horror story like this one. It was a Sunday night in Battersea. I was given a lollypop as I entered the room. Someone said, ‘feel free to walk around the space.’ The space was filled with raw chickens hanging from the ceiling like fat, dimply, headless men. I did not feel free to walk around, but, like the rest of the audience, clung to the walls with a growing sense of unease. Artists began to manipulate chickens enthusiastically. They tried to get the audience to ‘participate’ by flinging bits of flesh our way. I left when a piece of fowl landed in my wine.
Audiences, naturally, sit at the centre of any artwork. They’re invited to watch, asked to immerse, encouraged to join in. The relationship between artist and audience is delicate and personal, and the more unusual the artistic method (for example, the further a piece of performance gets from the proscenium arch), the more carefully the artist must consider who and how is her audience.
Joshua Sofaer’s new publication, The Many Headed Monster, published by the Live Art Development Agency, promises to be an indepth look at the relationship between artists and audiences. It is a boxed set containing a lecture, a DVD and image cards. Most importantly, it knows exactly who it’s aimed at. The Live Art Development Agency says:
‘Monster has been specifically conceived and created with higher education in mind as a tool kit that can be used as a resource to undertake personal research, or as an illustrated lecture suitable for students at all levels, or as a template for workshop and seminar programmes, or even as the foundation for an entire teaching module.’
I don’t know why it’s called The Many Headed Monster yet (I’ll be heading to the launch event on 8th April to find out), but I hope it has nothing to do with horror stories. There are two events to mark the launch – one at Tate Modern on the evening of April 8th, and one at Whitechapel Gallery on the afternoon of 7th May. For more information, including the type of audience each event is aimed towards, and how to buy the publication for a special launch price, follow this link to the Live Art Development Agency website.
Friday, 1 May 2009
What's in a name?
Mary Paterson considers the meaning of 'Rooted in the Earth' by Joshua Sofaer.
This article originally appeared on the Rooted in the Earth website.
In Victorian England, public parks were festooned with blocks of riotous colour. Carpet bedding – the practice of planting brightly coloured flowers into patterns – was a popular way of creating floral displays. The designs could also spell out an explicit message, and, where the practice continues today, carpet bedding is often used to represent flags, community emblems (like the logos of football clubs) and civic shields.
This summer, the artist Joshua Sofaer is going to create five new carpet bed displays, with the help of residents in the London boroughs of Greenwich, Hackney, Stratford, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest. Rooted in the Earth is one of two projects supported by the first Bank of America CREATE Art Award, designed to engage with people who live in the five boroughs that will host the London Olympics and Paralympics in 2012. Sofaer is inviting people who live in these areas to nominate someone whose name they’d like to see spelt out in a carpet bedding display. The five winning names will be planted up and unveiled in the summer as part of CREATE 09, the annual arts festival taking place across the region.
But what will the names actually mean? Any name could be nominated – your friend, a member of your family, someone who is already well known. But can an individual be contained within a name? Famous names (like Mahatma Ghandi, say, or Princess Diana) resonate with the residue of the person who owned them, but only because they link up with fragments of information from elsewhere. In fact, the resonance comes from the person who recognizes the name and can link Mahatma Ghandi to the country he was born in, for example, or the words that he said. This means that a name is just one part of a network of ideas, which becomes meaningful in connection with the rest of the world. And this poses a problem for Rooted in the Earth because, for the majority of people, the planted names will not link up with any other information – they could be the names of private individuals, strangers that you don’t know. Each nomination may be submitted with an explanation of up to 250 words, but even this will only tell a small part of the story.
In fact (and fittingly), the answer to this question lies in the name of the project itself. Rooted in the Earth is not only embedded in the literal earth of public parks, but it is also rooted in the metaphorical earth of the local community. Nominations for the competition will be encouraged from people who live in the boroughs where each name is to be displayed; the flower beds will be planted by a team of volunteers from local gardening clubs and allotment organisations; and, planted in public parks, the names will be maintained by local councils for public use. In this way, the final displays will not simply stand for individual members of the community, but will also represent the joint effort of nominating names, of building beds, and the communal act of viewing. While on one hand the names shown in Rooted in the Earth will be plucked from the local communities of Greenwich, Hackney, Stratford, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest, on the other hand, the process of Rooted in the Earth will highlight the workings of the communities as a whole. You might even say that the communal acts encouraged by the project will help build communities in the first place.
This focus on collaboration and community is particularly relevant given the role these five boroughs will play as ‘hosts’ to the London Olympics and Paralympics in 2012. Preparations for the Games are well underway, and obvious in, for example, the massive building projects taking place across the region. Already part of the landscape of east London, the Olympics will be absorbed into the lives of its residents in ways that are impossible to predict. Creating a platform for local residents to choose their own representatives, as well as a process through which the community itself comes into view, Rooted in the Earth offers a gentle counterbalance to this period of rapid change driven from the outside (driven by the planning decisions of the Olympic committee, for example). Waxing and waning over time, the floral displays act as a metaphor for the ways that groups of people change and grow: like plants, communities absorb the nutrients of their environment and adapt accordingly.
Rooted in the Earth also confronts the Olympics in a more direct way, as an alternative model of rewards and prize giving. In 2012, east London will be occupied by hundreds of elite athletes, specialists who travel the world in order to dedicate themselves to competition. There are big prizes at stake: medal winners at the Olympics do not only win bronze, silver or gold, but can also expect a lifetime of lucrative sponsorship deals, media appearances and celebrity. It has not always been like this. In the early Olympics, winners were rewarded with a single laurel wreath, and until 2004, Olympic athletes were required to be amateurs – individuals who did not earn money from their sport. In this Olympic context of concentrated, individual achievement Rooted in the Earth presents alternative role-models, manifest through the values of shared co-operation and understanding. Perhaps Rooted in the Earth is a platform for a different kind of heroics: one that is tied not to the individual but to the community, not to elite achievement but to shared goals, and not to competition but to collaboration.
And yet the individual focus of elite sports and, more precisely, of the advertising that grows up around it, is not a true representation of reality. Like the names displayed in Rooted in the Earth, great sportsmen and women are also the product of a community – a community of trainers, supporters, fans and sponsors – which blooms inside a system of competitions like the Olympics themselves. In fact, Olympic athletes, when they stand on the podium to receive a medal, occupy the same conceptual space as the names displayed in Rooted in the Earth: they do not just stand for an individual, but also attest to a whole body of support (a community) that acknowledges the individual’s special importance, at the same time as it allows him or her to thrive.
This is not to say that Rooted in the Earth is a straightforward emblem of all kinds of ‘community.’ For one thing, not all of the connotations of flowers and gardens are easy to understand. In Victorian times, for example, flower arrangements were used to send messages between people in secret. Inside this precise and detailed system, a red carnation means, ‘my heart aches for you’, and a striped carnation means ‘no’. Will the displays in Rooted in the Earth respect the language of flowers, and, if so, how many people will read them? In fact, the project’s double allusion to Victorian negotiations of private and public space (through the symbolic use of flowers and, specifically, carpet bedding) has its own problems. The Victorians held some beliefs about public duty that don’t seem reasonable any more – beliefs governed by strict rules about class and gender, for example.
There are also more contemporary confusions involved in Rooted in the Earth. The project is structured around a competition, and it is not clear what criteria the judges will apply. In this respect, Rooted in the Earth alludes to the talent shows and phone-in programmes on prime time TV – formats where the public is invited to submit to a judging panel, who represent a kind of expert common sense. But those formats are often cruel or deliberately misleading about the people that take part; they work on the assumption that the process of the competition is more important than the individual involved. Is this the other, darker side of community? A system that can suppress one person in the name of an unchallenged, collective authority?
As well as an act of community building and a representation of community heroes, Rooted in the Earth could be a system of coded messages, a reference to unnamed authority or a conquest over the agency of the individual. But the point of Rooted in the Earth is that none of these ideas replaces the others. Oscillating between the duties and codes of the Victorian era, the international event of the future Olympics, and the local interests of east London residents, Rooted in the Earth does not dictate its terms of engagement, but suggests a number of ways that an audience can take part. In fact, by presenting a wide collection of references and allusions, Rooted in the Earth comes closest to mimicking the productive life of an actual community. It is not the meeting point (for instance, a visual display, or a club house) that creates a network of individuals, but the individuals who continue to build and cherish the network itself. Rooted in the Earth is not a fixed set of rules, but a continuous process of negotiation. In this way, perhaps it is a model for civic life itself: negotiation that grows and reaches out to the future, fed on its ties to the past.
This article originally appeared on the Rooted in the Earth website.
In Victorian England, public parks were festooned with blocks of riotous colour. Carpet bedding – the practice of planting brightly coloured flowers into patterns – was a popular way of creating floral displays. The designs could also spell out an explicit message, and, where the practice continues today, carpet bedding is often used to represent flags, community emblems (like the logos of football clubs) and civic shields.
This summer, the artist Joshua Sofaer is going to create five new carpet bed displays, with the help of residents in the London boroughs of Greenwich, Hackney, Stratford, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest. Rooted in the Earth is one of two projects supported by the first Bank of America CREATE Art Award, designed to engage with people who live in the five boroughs that will host the London Olympics and Paralympics in 2012. Sofaer is inviting people who live in these areas to nominate someone whose name they’d like to see spelt out in a carpet bedding display. The five winning names will be planted up and unveiled in the summer as part of CREATE 09, the annual arts festival taking place across the region.
But what will the names actually mean? Any name could be nominated – your friend, a member of your family, someone who is already well known. But can an individual be contained within a name? Famous names (like Mahatma Ghandi, say, or Princess Diana) resonate with the residue of the person who owned them, but only because they link up with fragments of information from elsewhere. In fact, the resonance comes from the person who recognizes the name and can link Mahatma Ghandi to the country he was born in, for example, or the words that he said. This means that a name is just one part of a network of ideas, which becomes meaningful in connection with the rest of the world. And this poses a problem for Rooted in the Earth because, for the majority of people, the planted names will not link up with any other information – they could be the names of private individuals, strangers that you don’t know. Each nomination may be submitted with an explanation of up to 250 words, but even this will only tell a small part of the story.
In fact (and fittingly), the answer to this question lies in the name of the project itself. Rooted in the Earth is not only embedded in the literal earth of public parks, but it is also rooted in the metaphorical earth of the local community. Nominations for the competition will be encouraged from people who live in the boroughs where each name is to be displayed; the flower beds will be planted by a team of volunteers from local gardening clubs and allotment organisations; and, planted in public parks, the names will be maintained by local councils for public use. In this way, the final displays will not simply stand for individual members of the community, but will also represent the joint effort of nominating names, of building beds, and the communal act of viewing. While on one hand the names shown in Rooted in the Earth will be plucked from the local communities of Greenwich, Hackney, Stratford, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest, on the other hand, the process of Rooted in the Earth will highlight the workings of the communities as a whole. You might even say that the communal acts encouraged by the project will help build communities in the first place.
This focus on collaboration and community is particularly relevant given the role these five boroughs will play as ‘hosts’ to the London Olympics and Paralympics in 2012. Preparations for the Games are well underway, and obvious in, for example, the massive building projects taking place across the region. Already part of the landscape of east London, the Olympics will be absorbed into the lives of its residents in ways that are impossible to predict. Creating a platform for local residents to choose their own representatives, as well as a process through which the community itself comes into view, Rooted in the Earth offers a gentle counterbalance to this period of rapid change driven from the outside (driven by the planning decisions of the Olympic committee, for example). Waxing and waning over time, the floral displays act as a metaphor for the ways that groups of people change and grow: like plants, communities absorb the nutrients of their environment and adapt accordingly.
Rooted in the Earth also confronts the Olympics in a more direct way, as an alternative model of rewards and prize giving. In 2012, east London will be occupied by hundreds of elite athletes, specialists who travel the world in order to dedicate themselves to competition. There are big prizes at stake: medal winners at the Olympics do not only win bronze, silver or gold, but can also expect a lifetime of lucrative sponsorship deals, media appearances and celebrity. It has not always been like this. In the early Olympics, winners were rewarded with a single laurel wreath, and until 2004, Olympic athletes were required to be amateurs – individuals who did not earn money from their sport. In this Olympic context of concentrated, individual achievement Rooted in the Earth presents alternative role-models, manifest through the values of shared co-operation and understanding. Perhaps Rooted in the Earth is a platform for a different kind of heroics: one that is tied not to the individual but to the community, not to elite achievement but to shared goals, and not to competition but to collaboration.
And yet the individual focus of elite sports and, more precisely, of the advertising that grows up around it, is not a true representation of reality. Like the names displayed in Rooted in the Earth, great sportsmen and women are also the product of a community – a community of trainers, supporters, fans and sponsors – which blooms inside a system of competitions like the Olympics themselves. In fact, Olympic athletes, when they stand on the podium to receive a medal, occupy the same conceptual space as the names displayed in Rooted in the Earth: they do not just stand for an individual, but also attest to a whole body of support (a community) that acknowledges the individual’s special importance, at the same time as it allows him or her to thrive.
This is not to say that Rooted in the Earth is a straightforward emblem of all kinds of ‘community.’ For one thing, not all of the connotations of flowers and gardens are easy to understand. In Victorian times, for example, flower arrangements were used to send messages between people in secret. Inside this precise and detailed system, a red carnation means, ‘my heart aches for you’, and a striped carnation means ‘no’. Will the displays in Rooted in the Earth respect the language of flowers, and, if so, how many people will read them? In fact, the project’s double allusion to Victorian negotiations of private and public space (through the symbolic use of flowers and, specifically, carpet bedding) has its own problems. The Victorians held some beliefs about public duty that don’t seem reasonable any more – beliefs governed by strict rules about class and gender, for example.
There are also more contemporary confusions involved in Rooted in the Earth. The project is structured around a competition, and it is not clear what criteria the judges will apply. In this respect, Rooted in the Earth alludes to the talent shows and phone-in programmes on prime time TV – formats where the public is invited to submit to a judging panel, who represent a kind of expert common sense. But those formats are often cruel or deliberately misleading about the people that take part; they work on the assumption that the process of the competition is more important than the individual involved. Is this the other, darker side of community? A system that can suppress one person in the name of an unchallenged, collective authority?
As well as an act of community building and a representation of community heroes, Rooted in the Earth could be a system of coded messages, a reference to unnamed authority or a conquest over the agency of the individual. But the point of Rooted in the Earth is that none of these ideas replaces the others. Oscillating between the duties and codes of the Victorian era, the international event of the future Olympics, and the local interests of east London residents, Rooted in the Earth does not dictate its terms of engagement, but suggests a number of ways that an audience can take part. In fact, by presenting a wide collection of references and allusions, Rooted in the Earth comes closest to mimicking the productive life of an actual community. It is not the meeting point (for instance, a visual display, or a club house) that creates a network of individuals, but the individuals who continue to build and cherish the network itself. Rooted in the Earth is not a fixed set of rules, but a continuous process of negotiation. In this way, perhaps it is a model for civic life itself: negotiation that grows and reaches out to the future, fed on its ties to the past.
Anyone from anywhere in the world can suggest a name. After the competition closes on 22 May 2009, a panel of judges will choose five winners from the names and reasons submitted, one for each of the participating boroughs.
The winning nominations will be displayed as decorative flowerbeds in parks and green spaces across Greenwich, Hackney, Newham, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest, the five host boroughs of the 2012 London Olympic and Paralympic Games.
Rooted in the Earth is a Bank of America 2009 CREATE Art Award commission to artist Joshua Sofaer, who devised the concept for the competition and installation. It is part of CREATE, an annual arts festival across East and South East London.
Labels:
joshua sofaer,
mary paterson,
rooted in the earth
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)